Q&A Session #1, December 2022

By Wes Penre, December 3, 2022

Estonian

Because I’m occupied fulltime and dedicated to writing my new book, work title, “The Orion Book,” I am going to be sparse when it comes to making videos, and concentrate on writing. I have also started writing the third book in the trilogy, “Ismaril’s Journey.”

I will still be making videos on occasion, but to save time, I will instead write articles, like this one, and most of them, at least for now, will probably be Q&As. So, please send more questions to wespenre2@gmail.com and put “Q&A” in the subject line.

Here are the questions and comments for this session:

Question 1: When our souls were birthed from Sophia were we/are we subjected to the movement of the stars, moons, planets, etc. in the 96% of the universe like it is in the Matrix?  In other words, do we have a destiny to fulfill or is it completely free and clear?

Comment: Only when we are incarnated into a 3-D experiment are we affected by the star constellations and the heavenly bodies to assist in making us fulfill the destiny of the soul group. Destiny in this sense means to accomplish the goal with the experiment, set by the creator god who imagined it. Then the soul group in that 3-D world, whether on a star or a planet, evolves, using freewill to maneuver its environment. One day they will “graduate” and can then leave their home world and explore the Greater Universe, i.e., Orion or the KHAA. I will explain this in more detail in my upcoming “Orion Book.”

When we leave this Matrix, we are no longer bound by destiny, the movement of the stars, the celestial bodies, or anything else. Once out of here, we have full freedom to create with our own mind. Still, we need some practice when we get out there, and even being a creator god is a process. We can’t create universes out from the box, but we will learn fast.

Question 2: They say, “things happen for a reason.”  Is that true for everything we do in the Matrix?  Could you further elaborate on this?

Comment: I agree with that saying, it’s just explaining the universal law of cause and effect. If something happens to us, or if something happens in general, it’s not a coincidence. There are no such things as coincidences in a universe made of energy. In this universe, everything is energy, and if there is an effect of any kind, there must be a cause because the effect is the result of some kind of movement. Something or someone caused that movement. The same thing applies if something bad happens to us, for example. The “reason” it happens is because something caused it; it could have been you or somebody else. This saying also implies that even if something bad happens, the “cloud has a silver lining.” This is often true, but it depends on the person it affects. Is the person willing to learn something from it, or will they only put blame elsewhere and leave it with that?

Question 3: I’m not religious. But I’ve recently followed Christian beliefs doing things like reading the Bible and so on as they help tremendously with spiritual attacks and overall well-being. My question is: how will this subscription interfere with me leaving through the holes in the afterlife? Will I not see the holes as a result of dabbling with the Christian religion? I believe Jesus Christ is real and if he is, would he want me to go through the grid and will I find him outside of it?

Comment: Jesus Christ, as been discussed in the Wes Penre Papers (WPP), and elsewhere in my writing, is real, but the Christian religion is a manipulation. The entire Jesus story became inverted (see Question #4 below) and put into a religion that worships the male God, En.ki—our oppressor (Satan or Lucifer). However, if you study Jesus’ teaching and the Bible, I don’t see that being a reason why you would not be able to go to Orion through a hole in the Grid. So long as you know En.ki is not God, it doesn’t matter. Use your discernment when reading the Bible, which you seem to be doing, and it should be fine.

Question 4: What is your current take on who Jesus Christ was? I seem to recall he was an incarnation of Prince Enlil that channeled the message from Kahn Enlil. Has your opinion evolved over time with any new information or research? As I remember, there was more than one Christ and the one crucified was an incarnation of Marduk. Are these types or actual incarnations in your opinion? Please correct me if I remember incorrectly.

Comment: The Bible and the Gnostic texts—both containing true information—must also be taken with a pinch of salt, and discernment must be used. As is usually the case in the Matrix, things are inverted and reversed. The Invader Force and the Global Elite can afford to let some truth come out, and as I will discuss in the upcoming Orion Book, they actually want us to evolve to a certain degree. However, they desperately suppress the Divine Feminine and always direct us toward a masculine God, i.e., En.ki/Yaldabaoth/Ea/Archangel Uriel/Lucifer, etc. So, even when people dedicate themselves to the New Testament or the Gnostic texts, they still give their energy to the male God because they are both patriarchal religions/spiritual teachings.

The messages that have been given to us throughout history that were truly intended to enlighten us came from the Divine Feminine, not the Masculine of the Divine Masculine; it came from the Mother. However, over time, after these messengers have conveyed their messages, the announcements have been distorted and attributed toward the male God—En.ki.

The way I’ve come to understand it by now is that Jesus/Yeshua had a male body and the soul of Archangel Michael/Ninurta/Prince En.lil. He came here to funnel the Divine message from the Mother Goddess to us, and not from Khan En.lil, as implied in the Gnostic texts. He did not come here to teach the masculine principle of “spirituality.” I still argue that the Divine is Feminine in nature, not a balance between feminine and masculine. The masculine came later and is secondary to the feminine. The whole concept of masculine and feminine (and I’m not talking about genders) is just the principle of inner and outer creation. The Feminine principle is essential—without it, no creation. Then we call it masculine when the inner creation is directed outwardly, into what we call a shared universe.

Question 5: In the movie “The Matrix” there is a scene when Neo sees a black cat and then he sees the same black cat played out again.  He says something about Deja vu and Trinity explains it’s a glitch in the Matrix.  Is that really true?  Are we reliving something from a past life?

Comment: It is possible to relive something from a previous life, i.e., having a Déjà vu experience. Most of the time, we reincarnate into the same bloodline over and over. If I die today, and I have children and grandchildren that are of my direct seed-line, I will reincarnate in that seed-line. For instance, I will reincarnate as my own great grandchild. Let’s say the family has stayed in the same village or environment for all these generations, there is a chance you will walk through the same environment as in your previous incarnation, and you get a Déjà vu experience—a flashback. This doesn’t need to be a soul-mind memory, it could be an ancestral memory because you might have been your own great grandmother, and memories also transfer genetically.

Question 6: the Namlú’us who were used as slaves in the mines in the second construct, they no longer had the ability to return to Orion after their death. Were they recycled again to work in the mines in Africa and elsewhere?  Were they already in a situation similar to ours with amnesia?  And were their bodies already similar to ours in 3-D?

Comment: Humans in the Second Construct, i.e., the Atlantis Era, we could say, did not have complete amnesia, like we do, because that Earth Construct was less dense than ours, there was no Grid, and there was no Between-Lives-Area (BLA) in the sense that we have now. We still died and reincarnated, but we were not additionally traumatized in a BLA. The density of the planet, and the trauma we experienced when Tiamat was blown up still contributed to some amnesia, but we remembered more than we in general do now.

Yes, for a long time, many humans were reincarnated, forced to work in the mines, until the mining was over. En.ki experimented with different kinds of bodies in the beginning of the Second Construct; some bodies, he discarded, and some were clones to begin with (more like AI), and some were Namlú’u. But the latter were too frail and not made for such labor, so En.ki created the more robust homo sapiens and has since then stayed with that template.

If you liked this article, please consider supporting me by signing up on Patreon at patreon.com/wespenre. Your support helps me continue doing what I’m doing. Without it, I can’t continue with my videos and research. Also, it’s a 10% discount if you choose to sign up on Patreon for a full year.