Q&A Session #21, 2026

By Wes Penre, October 1, 2026

PDF [English, Estonian]

Welcome, and thank you for your questions! Please send more to wespenre2@gmail.com, including ‘Q&A’ in the subject line, so I don’t miss your email.

Please keep your questions as brief as possible. I understand that sometimes it’s not feasible to keep it short when conveying your message. Just doing your best is good enough.

To see my entire book collection, please visit this link on Amazon.com (and then click “see more” at the bottom of the page). Books are now translated into Spanish, German, Russian, Polish, and Estonian by various publishers, including Amazon. In 2026, we will most likely also see my books published in Romanian, one by one.

2026 NEWS:

Starting in July, I decided to publish two Q&A sessions per month, and I will continue. However, to do that, I need more questions. If I don’t have enough questions for a Q&A, I will use as many as I have, e.g., 1, 2, 4… whatever it may be. As long as I have one question, I’ll publish. If I have none, I will obviously skip that Q&A.

Please send me more questions if anything comes up that you want to ask.

Thank you,

Wes

Question #1: You keep mentioning the CONSUMMATION OF THE AGE, and im trying to figure out: is that going to happen any time soon? Because it seems like existence will vanish as soon as the Kenoma is absorbed. And then Orion is left, and then Orion disappears after that. Like when I die, I would love to create endlessly in Orion until I change my mind or something.

How long will Orion last? Because on page 60 in Chapter 3 in your book “The Nature of the Multiverse,” under the section called “Orion’s Destiny”, you mention that it would be more logical that ORION becomes a “treasure chest where creator gods, as individual units of consciousness, continue to expand the Multiverse for everyone to learn, including the First Source. Perhaps the physical universe will eventually end, but is there truly an end to creation and expansion, or is it infinite? Some say the Universe has died five times, and this is the sixth time around, whereas others give different numbers. I wrote about this in The Wes Penre Papers, The First Level Of Learning, but is there any grounds for assumptions?” That sounds logical to me. And that sounds real cool.

Comment: If we follow the Nag Hammadi Gnostic teachings and the WPP, there will be an end to the Kenoma, the physical universe “outside” Orion. That is inevitable. With that, the Archons will consume each other as loosh and will eventually be depleted of energy and consumed. When all Spirit is gone from the Kenoma, except the little the Archons have managed to steal from us and the kenomic environment, they will be left with nothing. When that happens (in a linear fashion) is to be determined, as it depends on how slowly this entire Experiment moves forward. It will happen, but no one living in the physical realms can say exactly when.

Orion’s destiny is a little vaguer. Opinions differ on that. Some teachings suggest that Orion will eventually succumb, too, since it is part of the physical universe. That makes sense. However, others argue that Orion, as Sabaoth’s domain, will persist beyond the Consummation of the Age (the end of the Kenoma/physical universe outside Orion), since he was allegedly promised Orion as his Kingdom. Whether that was for “eternity” or only for a time, I can’t say for sure.

Since Orion was once part of Yaldabaoth’s Seven Heavens, it should still keep Sophia trapped in matter if Orion isn’t consummated. Perhaps we can find an answer later. For now, it’s speculation. 

Some claim there have been five resets of the physical universe before this one. If true, it’s unclear how that aligns with Gnostic teachings. To me, Gnostic teachings have come closest to the truth so far, yet they are still written down and interpreted by human minds, which are flawed and biased, even when they try not to be. So it’s always up to us, as individuals, to connect our own dots.

Question #2:  Mister Wes, on page 238 of “Battles Between Shadow and Light,” you say that humans have taken a lot of energy from the Pleroma. My question is this: Is it spirit energy, or does it exist outside the boundaries of matter, energy, space, and time? If spirit is just a self-aware existential isness that can create something out of nothing, then how can the Pleroma be weakened spiritually by a simulation that has as its basis a created existence, a simulation that isn’t real, which is also based on energy waveforms that give the illusion of a material realm? Are thoughts energy? Are the Archons depleting the spirit realm of thought? Does energy actually exist in the universe, or is it just a thought form? Is spirit energy or not? As always, thank you for your priceless information.

To clarify, your booklet (Hidden Hand Tells All) says that spirit is the only thing in reality that is real. If that is true, then how can imaginary energy affect the Pleroma?

Comment: To narrow the question, the spiritual energy stolen from the Pleroma by the Archons is loosh, which they take from humans. Loosh is energy from Spirit, and we all carry Sophia’s spirit remnants within our Homo sapiens bodies. When a part of Sophia’s mind became stuck in matter, a part of her Pleroma essence did, too. This is why she can’t fully return to her true position within the Pleroma until the physical universe (Sophia’s shadow—the dark side of Sophia’s mind, hidden deep within the Kenoma) is consummated and absorbed. The Archons also take loosh from Sparks, but the Spark always remains connected to the Pleroma through Geradamas, our united Self—humans in fullness. This doesn’t affect the Spark the way it does Sophia’s Spirit remnants, which are left scattered in the Kenoma and within the human body.

So, Spirit energy exists in both the Pleroma and the Kenoma, since the Kenoma is essentially a part of Sophia’s spiritual mind.

Yes, thoughts are energy used in creation. This is why what you think matters. Everything you dream up and think manifests in the aether first as “thought forms.” Astral travelers sometimes tell us that the astral is a strange place with creations floating around, often without purpose or enough energy to become conscious, although some thought forms are. Other thought forms are only partially created and thus incomplete. And on it goes… it’s all created by human thoughts and lingers as energy.  

Question #3: Is Sophia also Ereshkigal?

Comment: Yes. Ereshkigal is Sophia in her lowest manifestation. Ereshkigal is the Queen of the Underworld, and in the Gnostic texts, she is listed as an Archon with the same name: Sophia.

Question #4: Hi Wes, loving your new singularity book so far! I come to the chapter on how to opt out of the singularity, and it makes a lot of sense that we can starve the system by following these guidelines and such. Many of us who know this stuff are probably pretty isolated from each other, so there’s got to be a come-together at some point. But how do you do that without raising the archons’ suspicion? There will be a no-return point for them where, as you said, they won’t care. But at this point in time, I’m talking about now through maybe the next 5 to 10 years, I think they would care very much if they see movements such as these amassing (of course, we have the hundredth monkey syndrome to overcome, if we can ever get that far). Just like every other movement that challenges them, and this would be a movement directly against their cause of not feeding their machine. Do you have any comments on this?

Comment: Although it can be very beneficial when humans on the quest come together in groups to discuss and help each other on their journey, it’s not always necessary. Reaching Gnosis (knowledge of who we truly are, why we’re here, our mission, and where we’re headed) is always solitary. We can’t teach each other Gnosis; we can only point to information that may lead a person toward Gnosis and help them achieve it within themselves by using their feminine qualities. Gnosis itself—the remembrance—ignites the Spark and spreads light into the darkness, like lighthouses in the darkest of nights. The more people who reach this state, the faster the transition from darkness to Light (awakened Spirit) will happen, and the faster our mission to prepare for the Consummation of the Age will occur.

It doesn’t matter whether one person achieves Gnosis in Australia and another in South America. One would imagine that the more spread out they are, the broader the Light will shine on the Archons and their shadow realm.

Will the Archons intervene? The problem for them is that they can’t intervene with someone who has achieved Gnosis. Once that happens, they are out of the Archons’ reach. There is nothing they can do to stop or deceive such a person again.

Question #5: Is the Monad conscious?

Comment: I view the Monad as the ultimate unconscious, in the sense of not-knowing. It’s the “nothingness.” Once, from a linear perspective, a spark was ignited, emanating Spirit, which was Barbelo, the Divine Feminine, the first emanation that was conscious. She was Spirit. She then created the Aeons, who create in their minds. Long story short, the Monad is both not-knowing and all-knowing at the same time. It knows everything that has ever been created, but nothing about what has not yet been created. This is because the Monad is neither an entity nor a being, nor a creator. The Aeons are the only true Creators. Even here in the Kenoma, Aeons make all creations—either Sophia’s remnant Spirit within physical bodies or the Spark.

So, the Monad is continuously learning.

A couple of questions didn’t make it into this Q&A, but I’ll add them to the next one around October 15.

If you liked this article, please consider supporting me on Patreon at https://patreon.com/wespenre .

https://wise.com/pay/me/perakes1

Your support helps me continue doing what I’m doing. Without it, I can’t continue with my videos and research.

A shout-out and special thanks to my Tier 2 to 4 Patrons, whose support is invaluable so I can continue my work. Here are a few who have accepted having their names mentioned. When I post videos, I will separate the Shout-out from the regular honorary mentions, as I used to do, but when I’m posting articles, I see no reason to separate them:

Lucy, Nadine&Jose, Naturalvet, Higherground. Denise R., Kim C., Esty, Susan Hassett, Vianne, Hema, Suzanna, Lova, αἰϝών, Stranne, SS, Ninotchka, Conrad Nagel, R3yn, Sovereign Spirit, Vitalinfo, KIM MIN SUNG, Cheryl, MCMG, Andrew, MikeO, Yohan Tengra, Renerio, Jose Capareda, Leo B., Claudia, Josh Churchill, Mark, Heidi, Jeff & Kathy Hatten, Meryl, Austėja, Haya, Gabi P., Bert&Monica, Jeffrey Jitterbug, just_put_it_here, Peter Zammit, and Dana.